A Journal Quality Manuscript:

• Is interesting.


• Is original, making a unique, imaginative or innovative contribution to the field.


• Contains a clear narrative from the introduction, through the work carried out to a clear expression of substantial conclusions and recommendations.


• Is of sufficient significance and relevance to the gas turbine industry that it will be referred to by other workers in the field for years to come.

Read more in Quality_Review_Guidelines

Quality Manuscript Reviews Provide:

• A summary of the important points of the paper in one to five sentences to indicate that the Reviewer actually understands the paper.


• A statement of the significance, relevance and originality of the research, or lack thereof.


• An critical evaluation of the methodology, accuracy and suitability of the work.


• An evaluation of the quality of the presentation.


• An overall recommendation for or against conference presentation and/or journal publication.


• Detailed reasons for the recommendation, whether it is favourable or not.


• Clear statements of both necessary and suggested changes required before conference presentation and/or journal publication.

Read more in Reviewer Selection Guidelines

Click here for an overview of the Turbo Expo Technical Publication Process.